Telus outages and service status in Wetaskiwin, Alberta
No problems detected
If you are having issues, please submit a report below.
Full Outage Map
- Telus generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Wetaskiwin, including 0 direct reports.
Telus offers phone, internet and television services, as well as mobile phone and mobile internet service through Telus Mobility. Telus internet service uses DSL technology. Telus TV relies on satellite or internet television (IPTV). Telus' mobile phone network supports CMS, HSPA and LTE.
Problems in the last 24 hours in Wetaskiwin, Alberta
The chart below shows the number of Telus reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Wetaskiwin, Alberta and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.
At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at Telus. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Telus Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
Mother Clucker ⛰️ (@0zWording) reported@krisster8 I refused and kept my job at @telus ultimately quitting in 2024. They tried to make me test every day I faked it by taking a picture of the same test every day. I never tested myself one time. **** them and **** that!
-
Hockey Dad (@Coach_JayH) reported@TELUS What happened to Telus- used to be a great provider. Now it’s a shell of itself. They cancel your service without your approval. Now you have to do all sorts of credit checks to get your service back that they messed up in the first place. What a joke.
-
Brent H. Cameron 🇨🇦🇬🇱 (@BrentHCameron) reported@JACruickshank Each episode is 20 minutes of self-congratulatory chatter & bragging about their fabulous lives, 20 minutes of ads for CN & Telus, and 20 minutes of **** talk interspersed with tactics mascarading as strategy...
-
Mother Clucker ⛰️ (@0zWording) reported@ADT, the non-compete with Telus is almost over. PLEASE Come back to Canada with ADT Blu, direct to consumer. Self-install security, no branches, just solid customer service & professional monitoring without them wanting to bundle your services before dispatching for your alarm.
-
Mike Brennan (@MikeBre58407055) reported@MPelletierCIO @BNNBloomberg Telus should worry less about selling non-core assets and more about minimal, basic customer service. As a client I'm appalled, they never answer the phone. Farming your customer service out to third world countries is pathetic, Telus deserves to keep imploding.
-
ama7 (@iceybluesea) reported@TELUS you suck!! especially Telus smarthome I can't login and can't speak to a human..
-
Alexander (@AlexfromBabylon) reported@Clayton37808570 Regarding conviction of MNO’s this is too simplistic. You have multiple buckets: Early die hards > AT&T, Vodafone, Bell, Rakuten, TIM These MNO’s basically co-engineered the Spacemobile solution. STC was late, but commited 1 billion of revenue as Saudi sovereign solution so I think they also fall in this bucket. Late followers that evaluated both in detail with non public roadmap for Starlink and AST Spacemobile and chose AST > Verizon, Telus, Orange, Telefonica, Axian. Next you have a big bucket of optionality ****’s like you indicate, but that bucket is under heavy pressure to make a choice. Maximum optionality is a nice buzz word, but in reality they have to chose between an architecture that is competing with them, versus one that is supporting them. On paper a strong line up, but Starlink and Amazon will be competing systems. Equatys, Iridium niche constellations not optimized fot consumer broadband. So if you wat a friendly solution there is only one choice. Deutsche Telekom is the study case of my thesis.
-
子非鱼（图片来自爱德华.琼斯素描） (@Gabriel66345738) reported@TELUSsupport He said no idea. Probably it is the cable which I use it to connect device and Model. I know he is wrong because I always use cable with no such issue before. Telus does not follow up.
-
子非鱼（图片来自爱德华.琼斯素描） (@Gabriel66345738) reported@TELUSsupport @brndntlrnlsn TELUS changed my internet plan from 1.5 Gbps to 1 Gbps without my knowledge or consent. There was no notice, no explanation—nothing. If I ask them to fix it, only results is they charge me $200, no improvement after the repair.
-
iPilot🅰️ (@OmniAeronautica) reported@bscholl $ASTS Blake Scholl Discovers AST’s Thesis, Then Forgets AST Exists Blake correctly identifies the hybrid terrestrial/satellite future, then skips enough due diligence to declare Starlink the “only good” satellite network while ignoring the company purpose-built for exactly that architecture. AST SpaceMobile has nearly 60 MNO relationships representing roughly 3 billion subscribers. AT&T and Verizon are strategic partners. Vodafone, Rakuten, Bell, TELUS and stc are partners. Vodafone, Orange, Telefónica and Deutsche Telekom, T-Mobile’s parent, are now conducting integration testing across Europe using ordinary smartphones and carrier spectrum. The fatal blow to Blake’s premise arrived three months before his post: AT&T, T-Mobile and Verizon announced a technology-neutral D2D venture explicitly intended to support multiple satellite providers, preserve existing agreements and increase competition. The carriers’ published strategy is the opposite of surrendering themselves to an exclusive Starlink bottleneck. The products are not equivalent either. T-Mobile still advises using Starlink outdoors with a clear view of the sky and warns that coverage may be unavailable inside buildings, aircraft and other obstructed locations. AST’s giant phased arrays are designed to provide carrier-integrated broadband, including voice, video, apps and “one wall in” connectivity. AST is carrier-neutral infrastructure that aligns with MNOs instead of trying to subordinate them. Blake identified the future, ignored one of its central companies, contradicted the carriers’ actual strategy, and typed “QED?” as if kissing Elon’s *** were a substitute for due diligence.