1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Rogers
  4. Walkerton
Rogers

Rogers outages and service status in Walkerton, Ontario

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

Full Outage Map
  • Rogers generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Walkerton, including 0 direct reports.

Rogers offers mobile phone service, broadband and dial-up internet, home phone service and television to individuals and businesses.

Problems in the last 24 hours in Walkerton, Ontario

The chart below shows the number of Rogers reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Walkerton, Ontario and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at Rogers. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Rogers Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • alpdenizdeveci
    Alp Deniz (@alpdenizdeveci) reported

    @Rogers I am keep getting charged fees even after I left Canada and closed my bank account. I don’t live in Canada but I still get charged $75 for returned fee on my supposedly automatic payment. I can’t even contact customer service! I just waited 2 hours in line! International!

  • Kevin1141531
    Kevin F (@Kevin1141531) reported

    @KimmyG6 @RogersHelps Worked there from 2007 to 2014. So glad I don't work there now. This company is so awful. Use CCTS it forces rogers to act and it lodges an official complaint against them too.

  • shawna_r80
    Shawna R (@shawna_r80) reported

    @RogersHelps I finally got a human being in tech support on the line - then he did something on his end and we got cut off. He never called back. I think this is my fifth cutoff in two weeks, my fault for being insane - doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result.

  • DarrenOrvis
    DJ2026 (@DarrenOrvis) reported

    Dear Rogers. Unfortunately, as a customer for 15+ years with all services including tv, internet, security, 4 cells, and a tab account is not good enough to answer the phone and waste 3.5 hours of my day. Sadly, I am now looking elsewhere. You need to do better. @Rogers

  • ACassan56
    AC@SS56 🍎 (@ACassan56) reported

    @TruthFringe @Rogers Rogers is one of the absolute WORST companies in Canada! I ripped there garbage out of my house 15 years ago and will never use them ever again! Pure trash company!

  • Loveataurus
    evanspence (@Loveataurus) reported

    @RogersHelps Already tried and they put me me to credit solutions and they wouldn't help me so i said forget it

  • margarethughson
    Margaret ✨️ (@margarethughson) reported

    @RealDonBradshaw @BlueJays @Rogers Should post this comment on all other teams as well. They are doing the same damn thing.

  • BrianOakely
    Darren Gudmundson (@BrianOakely) reported

    @RoastedKeyboard @Rogers Their actual product is also the worst. 20+ drops a day, Cable Internet, Winnipeg, for only $100 a month. They have stated their cable needs to be replaced, yet refuse to do so. "Screw you, we have regulatory capture!"- xoxo @Rogers

  • thatgrrl
    Laura Brown 🍁 (@thatgrrl) reported

    @Darth_Pingu @Rogers Labour (customer service staff included) is not cheap in Canada. They also require benefits, pensions, and so on and so on. A lot of costs to have employees in Canada. A business needs to make money beyond what their costs are.

  • petemare
    Marion Harrington (@petemare) reported

    @Rogers I am trying to report a fraudulent account. I have spoken to 3 people via chat, 3 via phone and have been disconnected from your Customer Solutions team 6 times with 8 hours of hold time. Please provide a contact so I can have this rectified