Telus outages and service status in Saint-Eustache, Quebec

Problems in the last 24 hours in Saint-Eustache, Quebec

The chart below shows the number of Telus reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Saint-Eustache, Quebec and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Telus Issues Reports Near Saint-Eustache, Quebec

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Saint-Eustache and nearby locations:

• 
  Politics, Sports (@Trumpismme) reported 37 minutes ago from Dollard-Des Ormeaux, Quebec

  As usual Ezra's in the money. If i were a telus customer of be changing companies asap.

Telus Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  DrivingDadNuts (@DrivingDadNuts) reported 1 minute ago

  @genymoneyca Interesting read. We just switched to Telus and managed to get 5 phones (whole family) for $180 all in month to month. Regular things they all offer (Canada & US stuff). They gave us 500GB shared a month which we will never get close to using.

• 
  W.C. (@Joe33932) reported 2 minutes ago

  @TELUSsupport When will you fix the constant sound drops on the tv. It’s happening too frequently when will Telus address this issue that’s been going on for years now.

• 
  Ronald (@TerrifyingWords) reported 5 minutes ago

  @JonFraserTF @TELUS Heh. Years ago I had to get the CRTC to force @TELUS to comply with their own terms of service. The amount of scripted dishonesty I experienced at multiple levels was unbelievable. No way it wasn’t corporate policy. Even their mandated apology was dishonest.

• 
  ChinoAleman (@chinoalemano) reported 5 minutes ago

  Most of this map is noise to the average investor. But one name is quietly sitting on the layer everything else depends on, and almost nobody sees it. That name is $AMPG. The one that I think will do a parabolic move like $SIVE or $AAOI. Let me tell you the whole story. Look at where it sits: Connectivity & RF. The re-shored, certified domestic alternative for 5G, SATCOM and defense. One name in its lane. Here's why that lane is the one almost nobody is pricing correctly. Look at every other layer on this list. Photonics. Compute. Physical AI. Drones. Space. Energy. Every single one of them, at some point, has to move its signal somewhere. Data has to travel. And the layer that moves it through the air is RF, the radio. It's the connective tissue under the entire map. No radio, nothing else talks to anything. Now the problem that makes this a thesis and not just a product. America does not make its own radios. The companies that build the RF backbone of modern networks are all foreign: Nokia (Finland), Ericsson (Sweden), Samsung (Korea). The Chinese ones, Huawei and ZTE, are banned outright on national-security grounds. So the most powerful country on Earth, about to wire its economy, its defense and its AI into a wireless network, depends on other countries for the physical layer it runs on. That is a strategic vulnerability. Washington knows it. That's the gap $AMPG fills. AmpliTech is the only American company that designs and commercializes a 64T64R Massive MIMO O-RAN radio. That's the highest-capacity radio configuration in the modern stack, and it's the physical hardware that open AI-RAN runs on. Not the only one on Earth, Nokia and Ericsson make them too. The only American one. In a decade defined by re-shoring critical tech, that single word, American, is the whole point. And this isn't a pitch deck. It's already real. It's deployed at Telus, a Tier-1 North American carrier, running on live Open RAN sites alongside Samsung. It's a Strategic Partner in Open6G, the wireless hub funded by the US Department of Defense and run by Northeastern, sitting in the top partner tier right next to NVIDIA, Dell and Qualcomm. Its radio was the physical unit in the world's first open-source Massive MIMO AI-RAN demo, running with NVIDIA's Aerial software. And it was the only American-designed 64T64R radio to pass multi-vendor interoperability at the O-RAN ALLIANCE Global PlugFest. Then look at who shows up on its customer wall: NVIDIA, Amazon, IBM, Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, L3Harris, NASA. You do not land defense primes by accident. Those relationships take years of qualification before you're even in the room. That's a moat you can't fake. Now the fundamentals, because a thesis needs a business under it. 48% gross margins, up from 33%. Debt-free. $50M revenue guidance for the year (and they hit their prior guide, they don't have a habit of underdelivering). And managament promised even more. Real backlog, real LOIs. This is a company that already makes money doing this, today, with the radio. And stacked on top, for free, two pieces of optionality. AI-RAN, where towers become intelligent edge nodes, the demo with NVIDIA points at exactly where this goes. And quantum, where AMPG makes the cryogenic amplifiers superconducting quantum computers need for qubit readout (it's delivered proof-of-concept units to names like IBM and Google). I'll be honest about both: optionality, not the core thesis. Cheap call options on top of a real business, not the reason to own it. Here's the honest framing that actually makes this stronger, not weaker. $AMPG is not a chokepoint nobody can replace. AI runs without it. Other radio makers exist. I won't pretend it's irreplaceable, because it isn't. What it is, is the sovereign alternative. The American option in a layer the US increasingly refuses to outsource That's a strategic preference backed by policy and funding, not a technical monopoly. And strategically favored can re-rate a sub-$1B company just as hard as technically indispensable can. And the timing isn't subtle. The US just restricted its most advanced AI models from all foreign nationals, even allies. When a country starts walling off its critical tech from its own friends, it tells you exactly how it's going to treat the physical layer its AI economy runs on. It's going to want that made at home. So in a map full of chokepoints and physical inputs, $AMPG is the layer that moves the signal, re-shored, certified, and American. The screens get the attention. The infrastructure gets the returns. Not financial advice. I'm long $AMPG. DYOR. 📡

• 
  ChinoAleman (@chinoalemano) reported 9 minutes ago

  Was it too late to buy $AXTI or $SIVE at $30, after they'd already run 600%? The answer is obvious: no, it wasn't. The people who stayed out "because it had already gone up too much" missed most of the move. Lately people ask me "Is it too late to buy $AMPG"? I haven't sold a single share. And that alone answers the question. Because if I truly believed it was too late to buy, what I'd really be telling you is that it's time to sell. They're the same sentence with a different face. "Too late to buy" and "time to sell" mean exactly the same thing. And I'm not selling. So I can't tell you it's too late without my own actions calling me a liar. Here's what people get backwards. "Late" and "early" feel like they're about the price. About the chart. About whether you caught the move or missed it. They're not. Not for a company at this stage. It comes down to one thing only: whether you trust what the company actually is. Think about AXTI and SIVE. The people who sold or never entered "because it had already run 600%" were staring at the chart, not the business. The ones who held or bought were looking at the thesis. If you trusted the company, $30 was just a stop on a much longer road. If you didn't, you thought it was late, and you'd have thought it was late at any price. Because that's the trap: if you don't trust the company, it was late at $3, it's late at $8, and it'll still feel late at $20. The chart was never your real question. Your real question was always whether you believed in it, just disguised as "timing". So instead of asking me about timing, ask yourself whether you believe the thesis. Let me tell you why I do. This is the only American company commercializing the 64T64R AI-RAN radio, the physical hardware the open AI-RAN future runs on. It's already deployed at Telus, a Tier-1 carrier. It's a Strategic Partner in the DoD-funded Open6G hub, in the top tier next to NVIDIA, Dell and Qualcomm, with its radio already tested alongside NVIDIA's Aerial software. That's not a meme. That's a real position in a layer the US is actively trying to re-shore for national security. Underneath that sits a real business: 48% gross margins, debt-free, revenue growing fast, defense primes and NASA on the customer wall. And stacked on top, for free, genuine optionality in quantum and in space. The kind of upside you don't even pay for at this valuation. I won't insult you by pretending it's risk-free. It isn't. There's customer concentration, there's dilution, there's execution risk. I've said all of it openly. A company is never a sure thing. But "is it too late" was never the question that matters. The question that matters is this: do you understand this company well enough to hold it through the noise, the FUD, the red days, and the people screaming that you're late? Because that conviction is the only thing that decides whether you actually capture the story or get shaken out halfway. So here's my honest answer, the one I can stand behind: It's late if you don't trust the company. It's early if you do. And the only person who can answer which one you are is you. Do the work. Read the filings. Build your own conviction, or don't. But don't outsource it to a chart, and don't outsource it to me. I just know which side I'm on. And I haven't sold a share. Not financial advice. I'm long $AMPG. DYOR. 📡

• 
  Mike (@fvkasm2x) reported 10 minutes ago

  @JonFraserTF @TELUS We left them last year after 20 years! Problem after problem the past 3 years with no customer service or effort to fix the issues.

• 
  ShredderCowboy (@PaulB527811000) reported 11 minutes ago

  @JonFraserTF @TELUS Interesting I was with Bell up until 7 years ago when Telus offered better service and lower costs and then slowly went down hill in customer service and my bills are always wrong.

• 
  Rick (@Rick19053470) reported 18 minutes ago

  @JonFraserTF @TELUS Yikes!! I just moved to Telus from Shaw/Rogers to get much lower rates and fibre-optic service.

• 
  Baynish (@bbassit4eva) reported 22 minutes ago

  @JonFraserTF @TELUS I was a 30-year TELUS customer; with great service. Then I moved to an older home. TELUS said it was impossible for them to connect me to WiFi. Rogers connected me. I canceled Telus. Telus wanted $700 because I broke my contract! They finally backed off after 3 phone calls!

• 
  James (@JamesMcNeill59) reported 30 minutes ago

  @JonFraserTF @TELUS Own your own phone. 1 to 2 year plan. Make sure the service is open after plan term. Now you're in a position to negotiate.